ដក​ស្រង់​ពី​ឯកសារ​ផ្លូវការ​របស់​មូលនិធិ Django

 

Model inheritance in Django works almost identically to the way normal class inheritance works in Python, but the basics at the beginning of the page should still be followed. That means the base class should subclass django.db.models.Model.

 

The only decision you have to make is whether you want the parent models to be models in their own right (with their own database tables), or if the parents are just holders of common information that will only be visible through the child models.

 

There are three styles of inheritance that are possible in Django.

 

  1. Often, you will just want to use the parent class to hold information that you don’t want to have to type out for each child model. This class isn’t going to ever be used in isolation, so Abstract base classes are what you’re after.
     
  2. If you’re subclassing an existing model (perhaps something from another application entirely) and want each model to have its own database table, Multi-table inheritance is the way to go.
     
  3. Finally, if you only want to modify the Python-level behavior of a model, without changing the models fields in any way, you can use Proxy models.

 

Abstract base classes are useful when you want to put some common information into a number of other models. You write your base class and put abstract=True in the Meta class. This model will then not be used to create any database table. Instead, when it is used as a base class for other models, its fields will be added to those of the child class.

 

An example:

 

from django.db import models

class CommonInfo(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    age = models.PositiveIntegerField()

    class Meta:
        abstract = True

class Student(CommonInfo):
    home_group = models.CharField(max_length=5)

 

The Student model will have three fields: name, age and home_group. The CommonInfo model cannot be used as a normal Django model, since it is an abstract base class. It does not generate a database table or have a manager, and cannot be instantiated or saved directly.

 

Fields inherited from abstract base classes can be overridden with another field or value, or be removed with None.

 

For many uses, this type of model inheritance will be exactly what you want. It provides a way to factor out common information at the Python level, while still only creating one database table per child model at the database level.

 

When an abstract base class is created, Django makes any Meta inner class you declared in the base class available as an attribute. If a child class does not declare its own Meta class, it will inherit the parent’s Meta. If the child wants to extend the parent’s Meta class, it can subclass it. For example:

 

from django.db import models

class CommonInfo(models.Model):
    # ...
    class Meta:
        abstract = True
        ordering = ['name']

class Student(CommonInfo):
    # ...
    class Meta(CommonInfo.Meta):
        db_table = 'student_info'

 

Django does make one adjustment to the Meta class of an abstract base class: before installing the Meta attribute, it sets abstract=False. This means that children of abstract base classes don’t automatically become abstract classes themselves. To make an abstract base class that inherits from another abstract base class, you need to explicitly set abstract=True on the child.

 

Some attributes won’t make sense to include in the Meta class of an abstract base class. For example, including db_table would mean that all the child classes (the ones that don’t specify their own Meta) would use the same database table, which is almost certainly not what you want.

 

Due to the way Python inheritance works, if a child class inherits from multiple abstract base classes, only the Meta options from the first listed class will be inherited by default. To inherit Meta options from multiple abstract base classes, you must explicitly declare the Meta inheritance. For example:

 

from django.db import models

class CommonInfo(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    age = models.PositiveIntegerField()

    class Meta:
        abstract = True
        ordering = ['name']

class Unmanaged(models.Model):
    class Meta:
        abstract = True
        managed = False

class Student(CommonInfo, Unmanaged):
    home_group = models.CharField(max_length=5)

    class Meta(CommonInfo.Meta, Unmanaged.Meta):
        pass

 

If you are using related_name or related_query_name on a ForeignKey or ManyToManyField, you must always specify a unique reverse name and query name for the field. This would normally cause a problem in abstract base classes, since the fields on this class are included into each of the child classes, with exactly the same values for the attributes (including related_name and related_query_name) each time.

 

To work around this problem, when you are using related_name or related_query_name in an abstract base class (only), part of the value should contain '%(app_label)s' and '%(class)s'.

 

  • '%(class)s' is replaced by the lowercased name of the child class that the field is used in.
     
  • '%(app_label)s' is replaced by the lowercased name of the app the child class is contained within. Each installed application name must be unique and the model class names within each app must also be unique, therefore the resulting name will end up being different.

 

For example, given an app common/models.py:

 

from django.db import models

class Base(models.Model):
    m2m = models.ManyToManyField(
        OtherModel,
        related_name="%(app_label)s_%(class)s_related",
        related_query_name="%(app_label)s_%(class)ss",
    )

    class Meta:
        abstract = True

class ChildA(Base):
    pass

class ChildB(Base):
    pass

 

Along with another app rare/models.py:

 

from common.models import Base

class ChildB(Base):
    pass

 

The reverse name of the common.ChildA.m2m field will be common_childa_related and the reverse query name will be common_childas. The reverse name of the common.ChildB.m2m field will be common_childb_related and the reverse query name will be common_childbs. Finally, the reverse name of the rare.ChildB.m2m field will be rare_childb_related and the reverse query name will be rare_childbs. It’s up to you how you use the '%(class)s' and '%(app_label)s' portion to construct your related name or related query name but if you forget to use it, Django will raise errors when you perform system checks (or run migrate).

 

If you don’t specify a related_name attribute for a field in an abstract base class, the default reverse name will be the name of the child class followed by '_set', just as it normally would be if you’d declared the field directly on the child class. For example, in the above code, if the related_name attribute was omitted, the reverse name for the m2m field would be childa_set in the ChildA case and childb_set for the ChildB field.